...
Which, of ITSELF, might make you tend to doubt Estulin's fairly reasonable-sounding case, but who the heck can tell anymore? I can totally hang with Anonymous being a false front. It can hardly be other. I even suspect heavily that Bradley Manning may have made a deal to buy himself a sex change... the story of his bust being entirely too fishy for me. I can't believe a guy who did what he's said now that he did, and who has comported himself as he has, or is said to have, for all this time, would be the same guy who would be dopey enough to tell that shady creep about it over the tubes. That just doesn't fit at all... and the shady fuck who supposedly turned him in is just precisely the kind of guy who would be needing to do whatever his handlers told him to do.
But if Assange was put out there to shut down the internet, and to fish for leakers, wouldn't this hairy deal have scared them all off? And if Assange were in it to sell information, wouldn't this present situation tend to put buyers off their feed? And if he were in it for these sales, how could he also be a CIA front? And if that's all true, weird as it sounds, how much trouble has Rafael Correa gotten himself into here?
I guess I really still just can't get there. I think 99% of the people in the Western World are so weak they can no longer even imagine someone actually being strong... so guilty inside they can no longer even imagine someone actually being good.
He's had some damn influential people in his corner over the years. Can all of them have been duped, or all of them been in on it? Seymour Hersh? Daniel Ellsberg? Jemima Khan? John Pilger? Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera?
.
